A provider could ask about genre, approximate length and the author’s goal. An extract would help define the assignment. The submitted version would receive a reference, and comments would distinguish comprehension questions from structural suggestions. A final discussion would clarify priorities without promising publication or acceptance by a publisher after the work is completed.
An illustrative example to adapt to your business. It does not represent a completed project in this municipality.
How should feedback and rewriting be distinguished?
The quote should say whether the provider explains changes or writes them. An authorized or clearly labelled fictional example can make this difference understandable before the manuscript is submitted.
What if the author changes the text during review?
Preserve the reference version and agree when additions will be examined. This avoids commenting on deleted passages or mixing two different states of the same narrative in the feedback.